Old School Film Hack

Imagecraft Bootcamp — Keystoning

Point Lookout lighthouse window view -- Point Lookout, Maryland (June 2015)Leica M3 + Eastman Double-X (5222) + Leica Summilux 21/1.4 ASPH

Point Lookout lighthouse window view — Point Lookout, Maryland (June 2015)
Leica M3 + Eastman Double-X (5222) + Leica Summilux 21/1.4 ASPH

Due to the low participation level we had for the last challenge, I figured we should ease up a little and take smaller steps — so this week we’re covering keystoning, also known as the tombstone effect or keystone effect, which you can read about in more detail here.  It boils down to this; our eyes and brain automatically correct incoming visual data in many ways that camera lenses can never match — among them is perspective control, or making vertical and horizontal edges always look straight and level.

The above image is a good example of this phenomena; upon first glance the image looks okay, but I begin to pick it apart the more that I look at it:  The sides of the window aren’t parallel…  The level of the horizon through the window in the distance is at an angle…  The top and bottom edges of the window are severely skewed…  Etc.

For some people, this is a non-issue.  However, I’m a very experienced mechanical draftsman and quite skilled in drafting from a two-point and three-point perspective, so I prefer to correct my images as much as I can while keeping them normal looking.  There are at least five ways of dealing with the problem of perspective:

  1. Fix it in production (place the camera differently, use a different lens, or both).
  2. Fix it in post-production (software or other means).
  3. A combination of production and post-production fixes.
  4. Leave the image alone and accept it the way it is, or…
  5. Don’t take the photograph at all and grump about it to the end of your days (and, yes — I know of some embittered photographers like this.  Don’t you be one of them).

Fixing it in production.  This can be achieved by choosing a different lens and/or a different shooting position and/or angle.  This specific image was taken with a 21mm lens, but the skewed perspective could have been better moderated by using a lens of 50mm or longer (wide-angle lenses are notorious for warping perspective, especially when straight edges are anywhere close to the image plane).  There is also the very expensive path of perspective control lenses — also known as tilt-shift lenses (read more about them here) — which would make short work of this particular problem (you can find a variety of tilt-shift lenses here).  I could have stayed with the 21mm lens and used a bubble level to make certain the image plane was perpendicular to the floor (bubble levels are cheap, but using them can be a challenge at times; you can find all sorts of models here).  Likewise, I could have used a through-the-lens solution to pay closer attention to what the image was doing before clicking the shutter (a change of just a few degrees can produce a dramatic difference with wide-angle lenses).

In this case, I was shooting from my full height; had I bent my knees down and paid attention to the symmetry of the subject (the window), I could have made it a lot more even from a sense of perspective.  However, the room was too small for me to use a longer lens; I would have needed to back up through the wall behind me and into the next room to have gotten this shot with a longer lens.  I could have bent my legs and gotten a more symmetrical perspective, but then I would have lost the composition that I liked.  Compounding the issue was that this building was utterly packed with people (and no tripods were allowed), I was having to wait as much as 3-5 minutes between shots for the frame to clear of unwanted subjects, then I had just a few seconds before someone else would step into the field of view, out-of-control children running into me, etc.

But I made the decision on the fly to go with what I had in hand and deal with any problems in post.

So that leads us to…

Fixing it in post-production.  This can be achieved by using two methods within Lightroom; the Crop & Straighten tool (at the very top of the right-hand panel) and the Lens Correction tools (third section from the bottom of the right-hand panel).  Other software packages may be able to do this as well, but I’m sticking with Lightroom for this series.  First, I go into the Crop & Straighten tool and use the fine grid lines that help guide me in making the far off horizon line appear flat (below).  As you can see, the change in this specific case isn’t much; just –1.51.

Correcting the horizon line in the distance through the window

Correcting the horizon line in the distance through the window

Then I scroll down to the Lens Corrections tools and play with them.  Adobe has created some preset buttons under the Basic tab, Upright section (Off, Auto, Level, Vertical, and Full).  Usually I’ll play with these first.  Why?  Because their algorithms are sometimes right on the mark for the look I want to achieve.  For those times when it is not, I then move to the Manual tab and begin playing with the six different settings they have there.  In this specific case, I’ll adjust only the vertical settings until the window frame edges appear perfectly parallel to the edge of the frame, which gives me correction of +30 (below).

Making the verticals parallel to the image sides

Making the verticals parallel to the image sides

And…  Hmmmm.

The result is not quite what I had in mind, as the corrections look forced and unnatural.  The image now bothers me more than it did in the beginning, because my eyes keep getting drawn to the lower half of the window, where the perspective lines just don’t look correct.  To make matters worse, I’ve lost a lot of the image around the edges — representing a pretty hefty crop over what I had originally.

After removing the keystone effect

After removing the keystone effect

So I’m scrapping the corrections up to this point and am going back to the drawing board.  However, these post-processing steps are important to go through on your own photos, as you can experiment and see for yourself what works and what doesn’t prior to finalizing each image.

In this case, I’ve decided that I’m going to go with just a small correction (fixing the horizon line in the far distance), and I’ll leave the keystoning alone this time.  That way at least the horizon line within the image won’t keep bothering me, and I’ll keep the rest of the image that I feel helps to complete the composition I was looking for.  In some instances, the overall aesthetics of an image are more important than having other aspects — like perspective — absolutely correct.  Only you can decide which direction to take, as it’s your photograph and you are the one that must live with the results in the end.

My final image, with just the horizon corrected

My final image, with just the horizon corrected

Here’s your challenge for this week: find an image with keystoning (like the one I started with), and see how far you can correct it before it before it begins to look wonky.  Once you’ve gotten to where you understand the process, then you can begin to wield the tools with more moderation, so that the final results look more natural.

Once you’ve finished, be sure to include “#photo101rehab”, “#photorehab”, and “#imagecraftbootcamp” with your normal tags — and if you wish to submit it to the Flickr group (we now have eight people in the team), you’ll need to post it there as well (https://www.flickr.com/groups/imagecraft_bootcamp/).

Good luck, and see you next Wednesday!

26 thoughts on “Imagecraft Bootcamp — Keystoning

  1. andy townend

    Ok, I just love this post, there is so much to learn here, and far better than a dry book or online video – Mitch do you do that also (if you not perhaps you could and should, you are a great teacher). So I am now in search of a suitably unsuitable image on which to work, starting with a filtered search in Lightroom for images shot with my 16-35mm lens which will probably need some work along the lines above. So, I may, or may not, be back soon 😉


    1. Mitch Zeissler Post author

      Nope! I’ve never taught professionally, nor have I created anything educational other than this series and the other tips I’ve posted on my site. But thank you for the vote of confidence!

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Jim Grey

    That’s often the problem with correcting this: it makes images bottom-heavy. Sometimes only correcting it a little, not all the way, does the trick — makes it look far less out of proportion while keeping the eye from immediately falling to the bottom of the image.


  3. Pingback: imagecraft bootcamp – keystoning | belgianstreets

    1. andy townend

      Thank you, one area I had problems with was the cityscape where certain buildings rose above the skyline and so were in shadow and the sky bright. Using the radial filter on the city at the lower half of the photo was not too hard but trying to pull details out of the tall buildings was hard without also messing up the sky again. Anyway, as you see you have got me thinking Mitch!


    2. Mitch Zeissler Post author

      Go to my About page and send me a message. That’ll notify me via email (which I’m not keen on posting in the clear due to the volume of spam I already receive), and we’ll work out the details from there.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. sprytely50

    Great post! Many Thanks.
    As a former draftsman I fully understand your “issues” with the photo as run into them myself. I really like your approach of fixing the one thing that bothers you most. Quite correct in my mind.


Join the conversation!

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: